Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-9400F on one side and the Intel Core i3-10105F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.1GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors [if indicated], the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
| Processor | | Intel Core i5-9400F | | | | Intel Core i3-10105F | | |
| Market [main] | | Desktop | | | | Desktop | | |
| ISA | | x86-64 [64 bit] | | | | x86-64 [64 bit] | | |
| Microarchitecture | | Coffee Lake | | | | Comet Lake | | |
| Core name | | Coffee Lake-S | | | | Comet Lake-S | | |
| Family | | Core i5-9000 | | | | Core i3-10000 | | |
| Part number[s], S-Spec | | BX80684I59400F, CM8068403358819, SRF6M | | | | Core i3-10105F | | |
| Release date | | Q1 2019 | | | | Q1 2021 | | |
| Lithography | | 14 nm++ | | | | 14 nm+++ | | |
| Cores | | 6 | | | | 4 | | |
| Threads | | 6 | | | | 8 | | |
| Base frequency | | 2.9 GHz | | | | 3.7 GHz | | |
| Turbo frequency | | 4.1 GHz | | | | 4.4 GHz | | |
| Bus speed | | 8 GT/s | | | | 8 GT/s | | |
| Cache memory | | 9 MB | | | | 6 MB | | |
| Max memory capacity | | 128 GB | | | | 128 GB | | |
| Memory types | | DDR4-2666 | | | | DDR4-2666 | | |
| Max # of memory channels | | 2 | | | | 2 | | |
| Max memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | | | | 41.6 GB/s | | |
| Max PCIe lanes | | 16 | | | | 16 | | |
| TDP | | 65 W | | | | 65 W | | |
| Suggested PSU | | 600W ATX Power Supply | | | | 600W ATX Power Supply | | |
| GPU integrated graphics | | None | | | | None | | |
| Socket | | LGA1151 | | | | LGA1200 | | |
| Compatible motherboard | | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | | | | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard | | |
| Maximum temperature | | 100°C | | | | 100°C | | |
| Cinebench R23 single thread | | 1,010 | | | | 1,180 | | |
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | | 5,571 | | | | 5,650 | | |
| PassMark single thread | | 2,470 | | | | 2,596 | | |
| PassMark CPU Mark | | 9,536 | | | | 8,992 | | |
| Amazon | | | | | | | | |
| eBay | | | | | | | | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor Intel Core i5-9400F has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-10105F is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i3-10105F was started more recently. Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Intel Core i5-9400F AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-10105F AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-9400Intel Core i5-9400HIntel Core i5-9400T
Intel Core i3-10105Intel Core i3-10105T
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Video liên quan