Top 3 search engines optimization platform ở vn năm 2024

Search engine optimization [SEO] is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines. SEO targets unpaid traffic [known as "natural" or "organic" results] rather than direct traffic or paid traffic. Unpaid traffic may originate from different kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search, news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine behavior, what people search for, the actual search terms or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by their targeted audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher on the search engine results page [SERP]. These visitors can then potentially be converted into customers.

History

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, all webmasters only needed to submit the address of a page, or URL, to the various engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed. The process involves a search engine spider downloading a page and storing it on the search engine's own server. A second program, known as an indexer, extracts information about the page, such as the words it contains, where they are located, and any weight for specific words, as well as all links the page contains. All of this information is then placed into a scheduler for crawling at a later date.

Website owners recognized the value of a high ranking and visibility in search engine results, creating an opportunity for both white hat and black hat SEO practitioners. According to industry analyst Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" probably came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[ – ] Web content providers also manipulated some attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines. By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank well in their search engine and that some webmasters were even manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.

By heavily relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals. Since the success and popularity of a search engine are determined by its ability to produce the most relevant results to any given search, poor quality or irrelevant search results could lead users to find other search sources. Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.

Companies that employ overly aggressive techniques can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients. Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban. Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google did in fact ban Traffic Power and some of its clients.

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization. Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website. Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.

Relationship with Google

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links. PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998. Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design. Off-page factors [such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis] were considered as well as on-page factors [such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure] to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes, or link farms, involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation. The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions. Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines. In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank. On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting. As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of , Flash, and JavaScript.

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results. On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..." Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique. The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine. Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words. With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT] was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users. In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

Getting indexed

cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list [link]

  • Laurie J. Flynn [November 11, 1996]. "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Jason Demers [January 20, 2016]. . Forbes. from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  • David Kesmodel [September 22, 2005]. "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  • Adam L. Penenberg [September 8, 2005]. "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  • Matt Cutts [February 2, 2006]. "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • ^ "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  • ^ "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  • "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  • ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  • Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry [1998]. "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  • "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  • Thompson, Bill [December 19, 2003]. "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  • Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina [2005]. "Link Spam Alliances" [PDF]. Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived [PDF] from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Hansell, Saul [June 3, 2007]. "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  • Sullivan, Danny [September 29, 2005]. "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  • Christine Churchill [November 23, 2005]. "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  • "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  • "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  • "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  • "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  • "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  • "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  • "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  • "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  • "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  • "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  • "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  • "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  • "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  • "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  • "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  • Sullivan, Danny [March 12, 2007]. . Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  • Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. [1998]. "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  • Phan, Doantam [November 4, 2016]. "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  • "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  • "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  • "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Jill Kocher Brown [February 24, 2020]. "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  • ^ Morey, Sean [2008]. The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  • "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  • Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Jill Whalen [November 16, 2004]. "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  • Andy Hagans [November 8, 2005]. "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Matt Cutts [February 4, 2006]. "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Matt Cutts [February 7, 2006]. "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Tapan, Panda [2013]. "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 [3]: 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  • Melissa Burdon [March 13, 2007]. "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  • "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  • ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" [PDF]. Archived [PDF] from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  • Titcomb, James [November 2016]. "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  • Andy Greenberg [April 30, 2007]. "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  • Matt McGee [September 21, 2011]. "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  • Jakob Nielsen [January 9, 2006]. "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  • Graham, Jefferson [August 26, 2003]. "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  • Greg Jarboe [February 22, 2007]. "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  • ^ Mike Grehan [April 3, 2006]. "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  • Jack Schofield [June 10, 2008]. "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  • "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" [PDF]. docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  • Stefanie Olsen [May 30, 2003]. "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  • "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  • "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  • External links

    This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008, and does not reflect subsequent edits.

    Chủ Đề