When should you use a participative style of leadership?
The business environment is dynamic. The primary objective of every business is to turn and remain profitable. However, this isn’t possible without a good leader who inspires their employees and aligns business activities with organizational goals. Leadership could be authoritative, autocratic, transformational, etc. One type of leadership is participative leadership. This blog will briefly introduce participative leadership theory, participative leadership characteristics, and various participative leadership style examples. Show
Participative Leadership DefinitionParticipative leadership refers to leaders who employ a democratic approach to team engagement. Participative leaders give employees a chance to express their creativity by coming up with suggestions to tackle a situation. This is in stark contrast to authoritative leadership, where all decisions depend on the leader. Under participative leadership, the leader empowers their followers and makes them a part of the decision-making process. As a result, employees feel valued and devote themselves wholeheartedly to the organization. Participative leaders can motivate their employees and extract better performances from them. This leadership style helps achieve the company’s objectives efficiently and effectively. Participative Leadership Characteristics
Participative Leadership ExamplesA large number of successful leaders follow a participative style of leadership in their organizations. The following are a few examples of participative leaders:
Participative Leadership Style Advantages and DisadvantagesThe advantages of participative leadership are many. The participative leadership style examples discussed above show that these leaders can push their employees in the right direction to attain organizational goals. This allows for a scope of collective decision-making, which enhances the skills and capabilities of the entire team. However, the participation leadership theory has a few disadvantages too. This style can be time-consuming, it may not work with unskilled employees, and improper communication could cause conflict. ConclusionNow that you’re familiar with the meaning of participative leadership, you can agree that the conventional models of autocratic and authoritative leadership are now redundant. The advantages of participative leadership allow businesses worldwide to enjoy continued success. These are times when democratic, participative leadership styles work best. Harappa offers various effective leadership courses. Join Harappa’s Leading Self program now! Explore Harappa Diaries to learn more about topics such as Types of Management Style, Advanatges Of Delegating Leadership, Various Theories Of Leadership and How to conduct Skills Gap Analysis to fill those and advance in your career. Where is the participative leadership effective?Participative leadership is most effective in an environment that encourages inclusivity and the professional growth of employees. Companies that value and encourage employees to voice their opinions and hone their skills tend to develop more confident teams that come up with better ideas.
Why is the participative approach to leadership recommended?Participative leadership improves morale. If people know they will be heard, they are more likely to contribute, and to feel like their contribution is valued. This is a fundamental requisite for a happy, motivated workforce. Participative leadership improves retention.
Under what circumstances is the democratic or participative style most effective?Democratic leadership works best in situations where group members are skilled and eager to share their knowledge. It is also important to have plenty of time to allow people to contribute, develop a plan, then vote on the best course of action.
Who uses participative leadership?Examples of participative leaders include facilitators, social workers, arbitrators and group therapists. A facilitator, for example, seeks to involve everyone in the process so that whole team forms its own conclusions collectively through dialogue and collaboration.
|