Animal testing laws around the world

As you’ll see, there are few laws protecting laboratory animals, and little regulatory oversight to ensure compliance with these laws.

The Animal Welfare Act:

The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, is a federal law that addresses the standard of care animals receive at research facilities. This law excludes roughly 95 percent of the animals tested uponsuch as rats, mice, birds, fish, and reptilesand provides only minimal protections for the rest. Labs are not required to report non-AWA protected animals.

The Public Health Service: 

The Public Health Service, or PHS, oversees the two federal agencies doing the most testing on animals: the Food and Drug Administration (the FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the CDC).

The PHS has a policy dictating vertebrate animal care for laboratories that receive federal funding, but the policy lacks enforcement and PHS’s oversight is widely criticized as inadequate. The agency requires only written assurance of compliance through the Office of Laboratory Welfare,OLAW. When a facility is found deficient, OLAW takes little action, has no mandated follow-up or on-site inspection.

The United States Department of Agriculture:

The United States Department of Agriculture, or USDA, is the federal agency responsible for overseeing and inspecting laboratories that experiment on animals, as well as those who breed and sell animals for use in laboratories.

There are big problems with this agency’s oversight. It’s generally known that the agency is underfunded and understaffed, and thus unable to adequately fulfill this important task.

The USDA last reported that the agency employs only 120 inspectors, who are responsible for ensuring compliance for more than 12,000 facilities. These include not just laboratory animal facilities, but also those involved in the of exhibition, breeding and dealing of animals, like zoos, commercial dog breeders, circuses and more.

Even if the USDA were fully staffed and funded, penalties for non-compliance are often inconsequential in comparison to massive research revenues.

Additionally, federally-owned facilities, like the Department of Defense, are not inspected by the USDA. 

Other Regulatory Bodies:

There are some other regulatory bodies that purport to protect laboratory animals.

One of these is the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, a private, nonprofit accreditation organization aimed at improving humane care for laboratory animals—though a damning 2014 report found that AALAC-accredited institutions are cited for more Animal Welfare Act violations than institutions not accredited by the organization.

Institutions that experiment on covered animals are also required under federal regulations to convene an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, which self-regulates experiments at their institutions. This body must include a veterinarian and one person not affiliated with the institution.

The IACUC’s purpose is to review and approve protocols involving animals, and to ensure compliance. The committees are often criticized as being too cozy with researchers, leading to lax self-regulation.

Millions of animals are used and killed in the name of progress every year.

Globally.

  • We estimate that at least 192.1 million animals were used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. This is the world’s most reliable figure to date.
  • This includes nearly 80 million experiments on animals as well as millions of other animals who are killed for their tissues, used to breed genetically modified animal strains and bred but not used.
  • We estimate that the top 10 animal testing countries in the world are China (20.5 million) Japan (15.0 million), the United States (15.6 million), Canada (3.6 million), Australia (3.2 million), South Korea (3.1 million), the United Kingdom (2.6 million), Brazil (2.2 million), Germany (2.0 million) and France (1.9 million), in that order.
  • In 2015, an estimated 207,724 tests using dogs and 158,780 tests using monkeys were conducted.
  • The top 10 users of dogs were: China, the United States, Canada, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Germany and India.
  • The top 10 users of monkeys were: the United States, China, Japan, Brazil, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, India and South Korea.

Europe

  • The latest report from the European Commission shows that 12.3 million experiments were conducted on animals across the EU in 2018.
  • The 2018 figures now include data from Norway, which was not included in previous statistical reports. They still include the UK as they had not left the EU in 2018. If Norway is excluded from the 2018 figures, the total number of uses of animals is 10.6 million, which represents a 2% decrease compared to 2017.
  • Despite increased public demand for a reduction in animal research, there has been little change (approximately 1% year on year) in the last 20 years.
  • According to the EU reports, the UK conducts the highest number of animal experiments in Europe (2.4 million in 2018). Germany is the second highest user completing 2.1 million experiments in 2018, while France is third with 1.9 million experiments that year.
  • There were 25,722 uses of dogs in 2018 with the UK (4,545 uses), France (4,219 uses) and Germany (3,979 uses) being the top 3 users.
  • There was a total of 11,194 uses of monkeys across the EU in 2018 with France (3,510 uses), Germany (3,278 uses) and the UK (3,207 uses) being the top 3 users.
  • Out of the total number of experiments conducted in the EU in 2018, 40% were for basic research purposes while only 16% were required by regulators.
  • Experiments are still being conducted for regulatory purposes in the EU where there are valid non-animal methods available. In 2018, there were 4,121 skin irritation tests, 880 eye irritation tests, 39,646 skin sensitisation tests, 30,453 pyrogenicity tests and 806,435 batch potency tests (a large proportion of which were likely to be tests for botox products). See more - Replace Animal Tests: The EU RAT List | Cruelty Free International

UK

  • According to the latest Government figures, a total of 3.06 million (3,056,243) procedures on animals were completed in Great Britain in 2021.
  • Of these, 1.33 million (43%) related to the creation or breeding of genetically altered animals who were not used in further experiments.
  • The remaining 1.73 million (57%) were actual experiments on animals, which included 441,403 experiments (25%) that even the researchers considered had caused moderate or severe suffering to the animals involved.
  • Out of the total number of procedures conducted in GB in 2021, only 10% were required by law – the rest were conducted voluntarily.
  • A significant proportion of experiments are conducted in universities, often relying on taxpayer funding.
  • A total of 4,227 experiments were conducted on dogs in 2021, including 4,016 experiments on beagles and 211 experiments on other breeds.
  • A total of 2,795 experiments were conducted on monkeys in 2021, including 116 experiments on marmosets and tamarins, 2,561 experiments on cynomolgus macaques and 118 experiments on rhesus macaques.
  • In 2021, 90% of the monkeys used for the first time in experiments were imported from Africa or Asia.
  • There were 24 tests on industrial chemicals used in household products.
  • There was a significant increase in Lethal Dose 50 (LD50) and Lethal Concentration 50 (LC50) tests from 9,784 tests in 2020 to 11,758 tests in 2021 (up 20%). These cruel and outdated tests are designed to find the dose or concentration of a substance that kills half of the test animals.
  • Despite validated alternatives being available, there was an increase in skin irritation tests, from 11 in 2020 to 18 in 2021.
  • Tests in other key areas where there are validated alternatives have dropped significantly but animals are still being used: 357 skin sensitisation tests and 59,586 batch potency tests in mice (a large proportion of which were likely to be tests for botox products) were conducted in 2021. See more - Replace Animal Tests: The EU RAT List | Cruelty Free International
  • We celebrate that, for the first time, zero eye irritation tests on animals were conducted in GB in 2021.

INFORMATION ABOUT ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS CAN BE EXTREMELY COMPLICATED AND VIEWS OFTEN DIFFER. WHAT APPEARS ON THIS WEBSITE REPRESENTS CRUELTY FREE INTERNATIONAL EXPERT OPINION, BASED ON A THOROUGH ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE.

FIND OUT MORE ABOUT ANIMAL TESTING

Animal testing laws around the world

Our History

subtitle: Established in 1898, Cruelty Free International is firmly rooted in the early social justice movement and has a long and inspiring history.

Science Page

Animal testing laws around the world

What is animal testing?

subtitle: Animals used in laboratories are deliberately harmed, not for their own good, and are usually killed at the end of the experiment.

Science Page

Animal testing laws around the world

Types of animal testing

subtitle: Animal testing is carried out in a wide range of areas, including biological research, and testing medicines and chemicals.

Science Page

Animal testing laws around the world

subtitle: Millions of animals are used and killed in the name of progress every year.

Science Page

Animal testing laws around the world

Which countries require animal testing by law?

How many countries require animal testing on cosmetics? China is the only country with a nationwide imposition on cosmetic animal testing. Even though this is changing slowly. Russia also mandates some animal testing on cosmetics, but it is very unclear which, why and how.
Tests on animals for cosmetics ingredients and sales of animal-tested products are banned across the European Union (EU).