What is the difference between actual performance and planned performance?

Controlling becomes easy through establishment of these standards because controlling is exercised on the basis of these standards.

1. Attitude of the workers,
2. Their morale to work,
3. The development in the attitudes regarding the physical environment, and
4. Their communication with the superiors.

It is also sometimes done through various reports like weekly, monthly, quarterly, yearly reports.

Once the deviation is identified, a manager has to think about various cause which has led to deviation. The causes can be-

1. Erroneous planning,
2. Co-ordination loosens,
3. Implementation of plans is defective, and
4. Supervision and communication is ineffective, etc.

❮❮   Previous     Next   ❯❯

Related Articles

• Controlling - Introduction
• Planning and Controlling

View All Articles

Authorship/Referencing - About the Author(s)

The article is Written By “Prachi Juneja” and Reviewed By Management Study Guide Content Team. MSG Content Team comprises experienced Faculty Member, Professionals and Subject Matter Experts. We are a ISO 2001:2015 Certified Education Provider. To Know more, click on About Us. The use of this material is free for learning and education purpose. Please reference authorship of content used, including link(s) to ManagementStudyGuide.com and the content page url.

Every organisation aims at achieving some goals from its business activities and it is essential to ensure whether or not the firm is performing activities according to the pre-determined goals. The controlling function of management helps an organisation in ensuring the same. Hence, Controlling means comparing the actual performance of an organisation with the planned performance and taking corrective actions if the actual performance does not match the planned performance. Controlling cannot prevent the deviation in actual and planned performance; however, it can minimise the deviations by taking corrective actions and decisions that can reduce their recurrence. 

Managerial Control implies the measurement of accomplishment against the standard and the correction of deviations to assure attainment of objectives according to plans.

– Koontz and O’ Donnell

Control is the process of bringing about conformity of performance with planned action. 

– Dale Henning

Process of Controlling

Different steps involved in the process of controlling areas follows:

1. Setting Performance Standards

The first step of the process of controlling is to establish standards of performance against which the actual performance of the organisation is measured. An organisation should clearly define its standards to the employees and must establish attainable, understandable, and realistic standards to be achieved. Standards can be set in quantitative terms as well as qualitative terms. Under quantitative terms, the standards of an organisation are expressed in quantitative terms like units of the product to be produced and sold, revenue to be earned, the cost to be incurred, etc. While setting the quantitative standards an organisation should keep them precise so as to easily compare the actual performance with the standards. However, under qualitative terms, the standards of an organisation are expressed in qualitative terms like time taken to serve a customer, motivation level of employees, etc. The qualitative standards should also be set in a way that makes the measurement easy. 

Besides, the business environment in which an organisation works is dynamic and keeps on changing. Therefore, the established standards should be flexible so that they have a scope of change whenever the business environment changes. 

2. Measurement of Actual Performance

Once the organisation has established the standards, the second step of the process of controlling is to measure the actual performance in a reliable and objective manner. The actual performance of an organisation can be measured through different techniques such as sample checking, personal observation, etc., and should be measured in the same units in which the standards are fixed to make the comparison easy. Usually, the actual performance is measured at the end of the performance. However, in some cases, organisations measure performance throughout the performance. For example, an electrical appliance organisation can check the parts before assembling them together to ensure the final product is not defective. 

Also, while measuring the actual performance of an organisation, it should be kept in mind that both quantitative and qualitative aspects are being considered. Sometimes organisations focus more on the quantitative aspects and less on the qualitative aspects, which can be harmful to them. For example, the quantitative standard of lowering the cost of a product can be achieved by degrading its quality. This can for sure lower the cost of the product, but can also lose the customers of the organisation. Different departments of an organisation can measure its actual performance differently (like the production department by the number of units produced, the sales department by the number of units sold or customer satisfaction level, etc.). 

3. Comparison of Actual Performance with Standards

The third step of the process of controlling is to compare the actual performance of the organisation with the established standards (in the first step). By comparing the actual performance with the standards, an organisation can determine the deviation between them. When the standards are expressed in quantitative terms, it becomes easy for the organisation to make comparisons as there is no subjective evaluation required. For example, it is easy for an organisation to compare the number of units sold in a month against the set standard. However, the comparison between the set standard for the motivation of employees with its actual performance is difficult. 

If the actual performance of the organisation matches with the set standards, then the controlling process ends after the third step, which means that everything is in control of the firm. 

However, if the actual performance of the organisation does not matches with the set standards, then there are two more steps in the process. 

4. Analysing Deviations

The actual performance and set standards of an organisation rarely match with each other. Usually, there is always some variation between the expected and actual performance. Therefore, the fourth step of the process of controlling is to analyse the deviations. To do so, an organisation must fix an acceptable range of deviation in performance. Besides, an organisation should focus more on the significant deviation and less on the minor deviations. For this, managers of an organisation usually take the help of Critical Point Control and Management by Exception. 

A) Critical Point Control

Critical Point Control states that the control system of an organisation should focus more on the Key Result Areas (KRAs), which are critical to its overall performance. It is not easy and economical for an organisation to keep a check on every activity with the same attention level. Therefore, it should pay more attention to the key areas on which the performance of the whole organisation depends. 

For example, if there is a 2% deviation in the production cost and a 15% deviation in the stationery expenses of an organisation, then it should focus on the deviation in its production cost, as it is a key area and can affect the profitability of the organisation. 

B) Management by Exception

Management by Exception is based on “If you try to control everything, you may end up controlling nothing”, and states that the manager of an organisation should focus on the significant deviations which go beyond the set deviation limit. For this, the managers should establish a range of deviations for the performances and any deviation that goes beyond the set range must be given attention. 

For example, the manager of an organisation has set the deviation limit in the production cost of 5%. Now, if the production cost of the firm deviates by 2%, then the managers can ignore such deviation. However, if the deviation is 10%, then it needs immediate attention. 

Critical Point Control is different from Management by Exception. According to the former, the managers of an organisation should concentrate on the key activities. However, according to the latter, the managers should give attention to activities with major deviations no matter where the deviation takes place. 

Advantages of Critical Point Control and Management by Exception

1. As an organisation with the help of Critical Point Control and Management by Exception deals with the significant deviations only, it saves its time and efforts. 

2. As the attention of the managerial staff is focused on the important areas, their talent is used efficiently.

3. It helps an organisation in identifying the critical problems which needs immediate attention and action. 

4. As routine problems are left to the subordinates, delegation of authority is possible. Because of delegation of authority, employee’s morale is improved . 

Once the organisation has identified the major deviations, it has to analyse its cause. A deviation in the performance of an organisation can be because of many reasons, such as faulty processes, unrealistic standards, business environment, etc. Therefore, it is essential for the organisation to identify the exact cause of the deviation so that proper and corrective measures can be taken for the same. 

5. Taking Corrective Action

The last and final step of the process of controlling is to take corrective action. If the deviations are within the acceptable limits set by the managers, then there is no need to take corrective action. However, if the deviations go beyond the set acceptable limit in the key areas, then proper and immediate managerial actions are required. An organisation can easily rectify the defects in the actual performance through the corrective steps. 

For example, If the actual performance of the organisation deviates because of the lack of resources, then the managers try to procure them to meet the standards. However, if the actual performance deviates because of the lack of skills in the employees, then the managers might give proper and required training to the employees.

It shows that every deviation does not need the same corrective action. The rule, process, or method of corrective action changes with the requirement of deviation. 

Deviation

It means the difference between the actual performance and standard performance can be Positive and Negative. 

Positive Deviation: It is a kind of deviation when the actual performance is better than the standard performance.

Negative Deviation: It is a kind of deviation when the actual performance is less than the standard performance. 

Example

An organisation has set a standard sales of 20 units per month. At the end of August, Akanksha, Sayeba, and Kashish sold 30 units, 15 units, and 20 units, respectively. Determine the kind of deviation in each of the cases. 

Answer

Akanksha has a positive deviation as her actual performance is better than the standard performance. 

Sayeba has a negative deviation as his actual performance is less than the standard performance. 

However, there is no deviation in the case of Kashish as the actual performance is equal to the standard performance. 

What is the difference between actual performance and?

Deviations are a difference between actual performance and standard performance.

Why it is important to compare the actual performance with the standard performance?

3] Comparing Actual Performances with Standards This comparison of the actual performances with the standards will reveal the differences and deviations. In real case scenarios, these numbers almost never match up completely.

When the deviations between the actual performance and the planned performance are within the limits?

14 When the deviations between the actual performance and the planned performance are within thelimits. 1. (a) A limited corrective action is required.

What is measurement of actual performance?

Measuring actual performance: If performance is not measured, it cannot be ascertained whether standards have been met. Comparing actual performance with standards or goals: Accept or reject the product or outcome. Analyzing deviations: Managers must determine why standards were not met.