What is an appropriate indicator for performing a contraction stress test?

1

Pose SV, Castillo JB, Nora-Rojas EO et al: Test of fetal tolerance to induce uterine contractions for the diagnosis of chronic distress. In: Perinatal Factors Affecting Human Development, p 96. Washington, DC, Pan American Health Organization, 1969

2

Kubli FW, Kaeser O, Hinselmann M: Diagnostic management of chronic placental insufficiency. In Pecile A, Finzi C (eds): The Foeto-Placental Unit, p 323. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica Foundation, 1969

3

Devoe LD, Castillo RA, Sherline DM: The nonstress test as a diagnostic test: A critical reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152: 1047, 1985

4

Thacker SB, Berkelman RL: Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected antepartum fetal surveillance techniques. Obstet Gynecol Surv 41: 121, 1986

5

Dalton KJ, Dawes GS, Patrick JE: The autonomic nervous system and fetal heart rate variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146: 456, 1983

6

Martin CB Jr: Regulation of the fetal heart rate and genesis of FHR patterns. Semin Perinatol 2: 131, 1978

7

Murata Y, Martin CB, Ikenoue T et al: Fetal heart rate accelerations and late decelerations during the course of intrauterine death in chronically catheterized rhesus monkeys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144: 218, 1982

8

Bocking AD, Harding R, Wickham PJD: Effects of reduced uterine blood flow on accelerations and decelerations in heart rate of fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 329, 1986

9

Itskovitz J, LaGamma EF, Rudolph AM: Heart rate and blood pressure responses to umbilical cord compression in fetal lambs with special reference to mechanism of variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147: 451, 1983

10

Natale R, Nasello-Patterson C, Turok R: Longitudinal measurements of fetal breathing, body movements, heart rate, and heart rate accelerations and decelerations at 24 to 32 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 256, 1985

11

Sorokin Y, Pillay SK, Dierker LJ et al: The association between fetal heart rate patterns and fetal movements in pregnancies between 20 and 30 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143: 243, 1982

12

Aladjem S, Vuolo K, Pazos R et al: Antepartum fetal testing: Evaluation and redefinition of criteria for clinical interpretation. Semin Perinatol 5: 145, 1981

13

Patrick J, Carmichael L, Chen L et al: Accelerations of the human fetal heart rate at 38 to 40 weeks' gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148: 35, 1984

14

Martin CB: Behavioral states in the human fetus. J Reprod Med 26: 425, 1981

15

Assali NS, Brinkman CR, Woods JR et al: Development of neurohumoral control of fetal, neonatal and adult cardiovascular function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129: 748, 1977

16

Campbell K: Ultradian rhythms in the fetus during the last 10 weeks gestation: A review. Semin Perinatol 4: 301, 1980

17

Visser GHA, Goodman JDS, Levine DH et al: Diurnal and other cyclic variations in human fetal heart rate near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142: 535, 1982

18

Dalton KJ, Dawes GS, Patrick JE: Diurnal, respiratory and other rhythms of fetal heart rate in lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 127: 414, 1977

19

Patrick J, Campbell K, Carmichael L et al: Patterns of fetal gross body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142: 363, 1982

20

Gelman SR, Spellacy WN, Wood S et al: Fetal movements and ultrasound: Effect of maternal intravenous glucose administration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137: 459, 1980

21

Richardson B, Briggs ML, Toomey C et al: The effect of maternal glucose administration on the specificity of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137: 459, 1980

22

Artal R, Rutherford S, Romen Y et al: Fetal heart rate responses to maternal exercise. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 729, 1986

23

Devoe LD, Arthur M, Searle N: The effects of maternal ambulation on the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157: 240, 1987

24

Rayburn WF, Motley ME, Zuspan FP: Conditions affecting nonstress test results. Obstet Gynecol 59: 490, 1982

25

Devoe LD, O'Dell BE, Castillo RA et al: Metastic pheochromocytoma in pregnancy: The fetal biophysical effects following maternal administration of alpha-adrenergic, beta-adrenergic, and dopamine antagonists. Obstet Gynecol 68 (3 Suppl): 15S, 1986

26

Margulis E, Binder D, Cohen DW: The effect of propranolol on the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 579, 1979

27

Keegan KA, Paul RH, Broussard PM et al: Antepartum fetal heart rate testing: III. The effect of phenobarbital on the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 579, 1979

28

Quigley ME, Sheehan KL, Wilkes MM et al: Effects of maternal smoking on circulating catecholamine levels and fetal heart rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 685, 1979

29

Peeters LL, Shelton RE, Jones MD et al: Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135: 637, 1979

30

Sheldon RE, Peeters LLH, Jones MD et al: Redistribution of cardiac output and oxygen delivery in the hypoxemic fetal lamb. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135: 1071, 1979

31

Nathanielsz PW, Bailey A, Poore ER et al: The relationship between myometrial activity and sleep state and breathing in fetal sheep throughout the last third of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138: 653, 1980

32

Powell OH, Melville A, MacKenna JL: Fetal heart rate acceleration in labor: Excellent prognostic indicator. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134: 36, 1979

33

Hammacher K: The clinical significance of cardiotocography. In Huntingford P, Hunter M, Saling E (eds): Perinatal Medicine, pp 80–93. New York, Academic Press, 1970

34

Lee CY, Diloreto PC, O'Lane JM: A study of fetal heart rate acceleration patterns. Obstet Gynecol 45: 142, 1975

35

Rochard F, Schifrin BS, Goupil F et al: Nonstressed fetal heart rate monitoring in the antepartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126: 699, 1976

36

Brown R, Patrick J: The nonstress test: How long is enough? Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 646, 1981

37

Devoe LD, McKenzie J, Searle NS et al: Clinical sequelae of the extended nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 1074, 1985

38

Devoe LD: Antepartum fetal heart rate testing in pre-term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 60: 431, 1982

39

Druzin ML, Fox A, Kofut E et al: The relationship of the nonstress test to gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153: 386, 1985

40

Smith CV, Phelan JP, Paul RH: A prospective analysis of the influence of gestational age on the baseline fetal heart rate and reactivity in a low risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153: 780, 1985

41

Lawson GW, Belcher R, Dawes GS et al: A comparison of ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and direct electrocardiogram fetal heart rate detector systems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147: 721, 1983

42

Divon MY, Torres FP, Yeh SY et al: Autocorrelation techniques in fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 2, 1985

43

Klapholz H: Techniques of fetal heart rate monitoring. Semin Perinatol 2: 119, 1978

44

Neldam S, Jessen P: Fetal movements registered by the pregnant women correlated to retrospective estimations of fetal movements from cardiotocographic tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 1051, 1980

45

Devoe LD, McKenzie J, Searle N et al: Nonstress test: Dimensions of normal reactivity. Obstet Gynecol 66: 617, 1985

46

Visser GHA, Zeelenberg HJ, DeVries JIP et al: External physical stimulation of the human fetus during episodes of low heart rate variation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145: 579, 1983

47

Read JA, Miller FC: Fetal heart rate acceleration in response to acoustic stimulation as a measure of fetal well-being. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129: 512, 1977

48

Smith CV, Phelan JP, Broussard PM, Paul RH: Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. A retrospective analysis of the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153: 567, 1985

49

Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD et al: Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized comparison with the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 131, 1986

50

Gagnon R, Hunse C, Patrick J: Fetal responses to vibratory acoustic stimulation: Inflection of basal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159: 835, 1988

51

Devoe LD, Searle NA, Ruedrich DA et al: The effects of vibroacoustic stimulation on baseline heart rate, breathing activity, and body movements of normal term fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161: 524, 1989

52

Devoe LD, Gardner P, Arnold P, Searle BA: The effects of vibratory acoustic stimulation on baseline fetal heart rate in term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160: 1086, 1989

53

Smith CV, Satt R, Phelan JP, Paul RH: Intrauterine sound levels: Intrapartum assessment within intrauterine environment. Am J Perinatol 7: 312, 1990

54

Nyman M, Barr M, Westgren M: A four-year followup of hearing and development in children exposed in utero to vibroacoustic stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynecol 99: 685, 1992

55

Maeda K: Studies on new ultrasonic doppler fetal actograph and continuous recordings of fetal movement. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 36: 280, 1984

56

Schmidt W, Gnirs J: Das KCTG-erste klinische Erfahrungen beim, Einsatz des Kinetocardiotokogramms. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 51: 437, 1991

57

Besinger RE, Johnson TRB: Doppler recordings of fetal movement: Clinical correlation with realtime ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 74: 277, 1989

58

Melendez TD, Rayburn WF, Smith CV: Characterization of fetal body movement recorded by Hewlett Packard M1350A fetal monitor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167: 700, 1992

59

Stanco LM, Rabello Y, Medearis AL et al: Does doppler-detected fetal movements decrease the incidence of nonstress tests? Obstet Gynecol 82: 999, 1993

60

Devoe L, Boehm F, Paul R et al: Clinical experience with the Hewlett Packard M-1350 fetal monitor: Correlation of doppler-detected fetal body movements with fetal heart rate parameters and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170: 650, 1994

61

Searle JR, Devoe LD, Phillips MC, Searle NS: Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 71: 407, 1988

62

Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CWG: System 8000: Computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med 19: 47, 1991

63

Schneider E, Schulman H, Farmakieds G, Paksima S: Comparison of the interpretation of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings between a computer program and experts. J Mat Fet Invest 1: 205, 1991

64

Hiett AK, Devoe LD, Youssef A et al: A comparison of visual and automated methods of analyzing fetal heart rate tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168: 1517, 1993

65

Blumkofe KA, Broussard PM, Walla CA, Platt LD: Computerized versus visual analysis of fetal heart rate: A reduction in testing time. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 415, 1992

66

Evertson LR, Gautier RJ, Schifrin BS et al: Antepartum fetal heart rate testing: I. Evolution of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 29, 1979

67

Keegan KA, Paul RH: Antepartum fetal heart rate testing: IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 75, 1980

68

Mendenhall HW, O'Leary JA, Phillips KO: The nonstress test: The value of a single acceleration in evaluating the fetus at risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 87, 1980

69

Visser GHA, Huisjes HS: Diagnostic value of the unstressed antepartum cardiotocogram. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84: 321, 1977

70

Krebs HB, Petres RE: Clinical application of a scoring system for evaluation of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130: 765, 1978

71

Lyons ER, Bylsma-Howell M, Siamsi S et al: A scoring system for nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 242, 1979

72

Devoe LD, Yanowitch G, Azor H: The application of multiple-parameter scoring to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. J Reprod Med 26: 250, 1981

73

Pearson JF, Weayer JB: A six-point scoring system for antenatal cardiotocographs. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 85: 321, 1978

74

Devoe LD, Castillo R, McKenzie J et al: Sequential non-stress testing using each fetus as its own control. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 931, 1986

75

Schifrin BS, Foye G, Amato J et al: Routine fetal heart rate monitoring in the antepartum period. Obstet Gynecol 54: 21, 1979

76

Elynn AM, Kelly J, O'Connor M: Unstressed antepartum cardiotocography in the management of the fetus suspected of growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86: 106, 1979

77

Lin CC, Devoe LD, River P et al: Oxytocin challenge test and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140: 282, 1981

78

Devoe LD, Sholl JS: Postdates pregnancy: Assessment of fetal risk and obstetric management. J Reprod Med 28: 576, 1983

79

Yeh SY, Read JA: Management of post-term pregnancy in a large obstetric population. Obstet Gynecol 60: 282, 1982

80

Lavin JP, Miodovnik M, Barden TP: Relationship of nonstress test reactivity and gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 63: 338, 1984

81

Bailey D, Flynn AM, Kelly J et al: Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring in multiple pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87: 561, 1980

82

Devoe LD, Azor H: Simultaneous nonstress fetal heart rate testing in twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 58: 450, 1981

83

Blake GD, Knuppel RA, Ingardia CJ et al: Evaluation of nonstress testing in multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol 63: 528, 1984

84

Nayot D, Mor-YoSef S, Granat M et al: Antepartum fetal heart rate pattern associated with major congenital malformations. Obstet Gynecol 63: 414, 1984

85

Powell-Phillips WD, Towell ME: Abnormal fetal heart rate associated with congenital abnormalities. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87: 270, 1980

86

Vorher H: Placental insufficiency in relation to post-term pregnancy and fetal postmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 123: 67, 1975

87

Young BK, Katz M, Wilson SJ: Sinusoidal fetal heart rate: I. Clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 587, 1980

88

Boehm FH, Salyer S, Shah DM et al: Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing. Obstet Gynecol 67: 566, 1986

89

Ray M, Freeman RK, Pine S et al: Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114: 1, 1972

90

Freeman RK: The use of the oxytocin challenge test for antepartum clinical evaluation of uteroplacental respiratory function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121: 481, 1975

91

Trierweiler MW, Freeman RK, James J: Baseline fetal heart rate characteristics as an indicator of fetal status during the antepartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125: 618, 1976

92

Fox HE, Steinbrecher M, Ripton B: Antepartum fetal heart and uterine activity studies: I. Preliminary report of accelerations and the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126: 61, 1976

93

Farahani G, Fenton AN: Fetal heart rate acceleration in relation to the oxytocin challenge test. Obstet Gynecol 49: 163, 1977

94

Braly P, Freeman RK: The significance of fetal heart rate reactivity with a positive oxytocin challenge test. Obstet Gynecol 50: 689, 1977

95

Huddleston JF, Sutliff G, Robinson D: Contraction stress test by intermittent nipple stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 63: 699, 1984

96

Devoe LD: Clinical implications of prospective antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137: 983, 1980

97

Keane MW, Horger ED, Vice L: Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 57: 320, 1981

98

Lee CY, Drukker B: The nonstress test for the antepartum assessment of fetal reserve. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134: 460, 1979

99

Leveno KJ, Williams ML, DePalma RT et al: Perinatal outcome in the absence of antepartum fetal heart rate acceleration. Obstet Gynecol 61: 347, 1983

100

Phelan JP: The nonstress test: A review of 3000 tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139: 7, 1981

101

Mashini IS, Devoe LD, McKenzie J et al: Comparison of uterine activity induced by nipple stimulation and oxytocin. Obstet Gynecol 69: 74, 1987

102

Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W: A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring: I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143: 771, 1982

103

Devoe LD: Clinical features of the reactive positive contraction stress test. Obstet Gynecol 63: 523, 1984

104

Staisch KJ, Westlake JR, Bashore RA: Blind oxytocin challenge test and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138: 399, 1980

105

Baskett TF, Sandy EA: Oxytocin challenge test and antepartum fetal assessment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84: 39, 1977

106

Schifrin BS, Lapidus M, Doctor GS et al: Contraction stress for antepartum fetal evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 45: 433, 1975

107

Trimbos JB, Keirse MJNC: Significance of antepartum cardiotocography in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 85: 907, 1978

108

Phelan JP, Lewis PE: Fetal heart rate decelerations during a nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 57: 228, 1981

109

O'Leary JA, Adrinopoulous GC, Gioroano PC: Variable decelerations and the nonstress test: An indication of cord compromise. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137: 704, 1980

110

Pazos R, Vuolo K, Aladjem S et al: Association of spontaneous fetal heart rate decelerations during antepartum nonstress testing and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144: 574, 1982

111

Bourgeois FJ, Thiagarajah S, Harbert GM: The significance of fetal heart rate decelerations during nonstress testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150: 213, 1984

112

Druzin ML, Gratacos J, Keegan K, Paul RH: Antepartum fetal heart rate testing: VII. The significance of fetal bradycardia. The significance of fetal bradycardia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139: 194, 1981

113

Odendaal HJ: Hyperstimulation of the uterus during the oxytocin stress test. Obstet Gynecol 51: 380, 1978

114

Gabbe SG, Freeman RK, Goebelsmann U: Evaluation of the contraction stress test before 33 weeks' gestation. Obstet Gynecol 52: 649, 1978

115

Klapholz H, Burke L: Intrauterine fetal demise with a negative oxytocin challenge test. J Reprod Med 15: 169, 1975

116

Lorenz RP, Pagano JS: A case of fetal death after a negative oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130: 232, 1978

117

Salerno NJ, Thomas RK: A further challenge to the validity of the weekly interval between oxytocin challenge tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130: 232, 1978

118

Evertson LR, Gauthier RJ, Collea JV: Fetal demise following negative contraction stress tests. Obstet Gynecol 51: 671, 1978

119

Liggins GC, Howie RN: A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 50: 515, 1972

120

Bissonnette JM, Johnson K, Toomey C: The role of a trial of labor with a positive contraction stress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135: 292, 1979

121

Odendaal NJ: The fetal and labor outcome of 102 positive contraction stress tests. Obstet Gynecol 54: 591, 1979

122

Devoe KD, Morrison J, Martin J et al: A prospective comparative study of the extended nonstress test and nipple stimulation contraction stress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157: 531, 1987

123

Devoe LD, Castillo R, Saad S et al: Percent acceleration time: A new method of fetal assessment. Obstet Gynecol 67: 191, 1986

124

Beischer BA, Drew JH, Ashton PW et al: Quality of survival of infants with critical fetal reserve detected by antenatal cardiotocography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146: 662, 1983

125

Trimbos JB, Keirse MJ: Observer variability in assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 85: 900, 1978

126

Hage ML: Interpretation of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153: 490, 1985

127

Boehm FH, Fields LM, Hutchinson JM et al: The indirectly obtained fetal heart rate: Comparison of first and second generation electronic fetal monitors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 10, 1986

128

Brown V, Sawers RS, Parsons RJ et al: The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high risk pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89: 716, 1982

129

Flynn AM, Kelly J, Mansfield H et al: A randomized controlled trial of nonstress antepartum cardiotocography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89: 427, 1982

130

Kidd LC, Patel NB, Smith R: Nonstress antenatal cardiotocography—a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 1156, 1985

131

Lumley J, Lester A, Anderson I: A randomized trial of weekly cardiotocography in high risk obstetric patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90: 1018, 1983

132

Neilson JP: Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment in pregnancy and childbirth module. In Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP (eds): Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Review no. 03881, March 24, 1993. Disk Issue 1. Oxford, Update Software, 1994

133

Devoe LD, Gardner P, Dear C, Castillo RA: The diagnostic values of concurrent nonstress testing, amniotic fluid measurement, and doppler velocimetry in screening a general high risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163: 1040, 1990

134

Platt LD, Paul RH, Phelan J et al: Fifteen years of experience with antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156: 1509, 1987

135

Garite TJ, Freeman RK, Hochleutner I et al: Oxytocin challenge test: Achieving the desired goals. Obstet Gynecol 51: 614, 1978